Pages: i-vi | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb00664.x | Cited by: 0
Pages: vii-xxiv | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb00665.x | Cited by: 0
Pages: 1-13 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03530.x | Cited by: 157
This paper focuses on the impact of taxes on optimal corporate pension policy. The analysis is based upon an integration of corporate and individual shareholder considerations. The major conclusions are that a company should fully fund its pension plan and should invest the pension fund totally in bonds.
Pages: 15-29 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03531.x | Cited by: 143
G. WILLIAM SCHWERT
This paper analyzes the reaction of stock prices to the new information about inflation. Based on daily returns to the Standard and Poor's composite portfolio from 1953–78, it seems that the stock market reacts negatively to the announcement of unexpected inflation in the Consumer Price Index (C.P.I.), although the magnitude of the reaction is small. It is interesting to note that the stock market seems to react at the time of announcement of the C.P.I., approximately one month after the price data are collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Pages: 31-41 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03532.x | Cited by: 20
ROGER D. HUANG
The variance bounds on exchange rate movements implied by the monetary approach to exchange rate in an efficient foreign exchange market is shown to be violated by sample data. The paper also presents evidence showing that the forecast errors implied by the monetary model can be forecasted using historical data. The results are interpreted to suggest either the incompatibility of the monetary approach with sample data, or an inefficient foreign exchange market or both.
Pages: 43-49 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03533.x | Cited by: 47
The efficiency of the Canadian‐U.S. exchange market for the current float is examined more extensively than previously. Semi‐strong‐form tests which admit the lagged spot rate as a predictor are considered in addition to the standard weak‐form test. These stronger tests reject the joint null hypothesis of an efficient exchange market and no risk premium for the period ending in October 1976, although not for the entire period. For almost every year the current spot rate provided a better forecast of the future spot rate than did the current forward rate.
Pages: 51-60 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03534.x | Cited by: 69
STEPHEN A. BUSER, ANDREW H. CHEN, EDWARD J. KANE
This paper seeks to explain the combination of explicit and implicit pricing for deposit insurance employed by the FDIC. Essentially, the FDIC sells two products—insurance and regulation. To span the product space, it must and does set two prices. We argue that the need to establish regulatory disincentives to bank risk‐taking is the heart of the controversy over the adequacy of bank capital and that the ability to close risky banks before exhausting their charter value (i.e., the value of their right to continue in business) stands at the center of these disincentives and in front of the FDIC's insurance reserves.
Pages: 61-79 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03535.x | Cited by: 1
RICHARD J. KENT
Three policies of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, the Specially Priced Advances Program in 1970–1, a program of advances at a reduced interest rate in 1974, and changes in the minimum liquidity ratio, are analyzed. A model of portfolio allocation is developed and estimated for savings and loan associations. Most of the net increase in advances borrowed under the first two programs have not been lent in the mortgage market. Reductions in the minimum liquidity requirement have resulted in an increase in mortgage lending, but substantial effects are not felt until a year after the liquidity requirement is reduced.
Pages: 81-96 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03536.x | Cited by: 5
RALPH A. WINTER
This article re‐examines the conclusion of previous studies that price dispersion is extreme in the American whole life insurance market. We take an axiomatic approach to the problem of measuring “price” dispersion in the market for the multiparameter whole life contracts, studying the distribution across contract offers of a price index which is uniquely determined by two conditions. In contrast to the accepted wisdom, we find that the derived measure of price dispersion is only 3.6% and that much of this dispersion can be accounted for by measurement error.
Pages: 97-111 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03537.x | Cited by: 8
WILBUR G. LEWELLEN, DOUGLAS R. EMERY
The lessons of the leasing literature concerning the impact of leases on the debt capacity of a firm are reviewed and summarized to establish an approach to the analysis of the corporate bond refunding decision. A general proposition regarding financial obligation parity is established, and from that a clear bond refunding decision rule is developed. Previous debates in the literature about appropriate discount rates and about the appropriate cash flows to be discounted for refunding decisions are clarified.
Pages: 113-125 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03538.x | Cited by: 6
T. AGMON, A. R. OFER, A. TAMIR
Pages: 127-141 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03539.x | Cited by: 2
ROBERT R. GRAUER
The results of previous generalized Security Market Line (SML) tests of the Mean Variance (MV) and Linear Risk Tolerance (LRT) Capital Asset Pricing Models indicate that the models are empirically identical. A very widely accepted, but technically incorrect, explanation for the results is that with normal return distributions all expected utility maximizing riskaverse investors will pick MV portfolios. The paper shows that the generalized SML tests cannot distinguish between the MV model and a much wider variety of power utility LRT models than has previously been entertained. On the other hand, with approximately normal, or real world, return distributions the investment policies of the various models are shown to be different from each other, and from the MV policy in particular. To the extent the results of the portfolio selection calculations are robust, the results of, and implications drawn from, the tests of the macro pricing relations are not based on firm micro foundations.
Pages: 143-161 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03540.x | Cited by: 166
ROBERT H. JENNINGS, LAURA T. STARKS, JOHN C. FELLINGHAM
In an effort to better understand the dynamic market price adjustment process, this paper develops a model which describes the impact of new information on a financial market. The primary emphasis is on the price change‐volume relationship in the presence of a margin requirement. We find that the margin requirement significantly affects the relation of price change to volume. Furthermore, this relationship is shown to be affected by the number of investors in the market, the degree of information dissemination, differences in interpretation of information and the implicit cost of the margin requirement.
Pages: 163-180 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03541.x | Cited by: 24
A mean‐variance risk‐return tradeoff relationship is derived for the diffusion process limiting case of a state‐preference model, with aggregate consumption serving as a pivotal variable. The model is compared to other recent models along the dimensions of generality and tractable implementation. The incorporation of stochastic interest rates in general equilibrium and arbitrage‐based valuation models is examined, and an extension to earlier methods is discussed, in connection with the implementation of “robust” general valuation procedures.
Pages: 181-186 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03542.x | Cited by: 3
D. K. OSBORNE, JEANNE WENDEL
A recent survey (Rhoades, 1977b) of StructureConductPerformance studies in banking lists twelve studies of the effect of concentration on checkingaccount prices. All twelve rely on proxies for price instead of actual price. Here we evaluate this practice by comparing the three most widely used proxies with the prices actually charged by a sample of 154 Texas banks.
Pages: 187-190 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03543.x | Cited by: 5
Pages: 191-192 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03544.x | Cited by: 6
TAMIR AGMON, DONALD LESSARD
Pages: 193-195 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03545.x | Cited by: 2
DAVID J. NICOL
Pages: 197-197 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03546.x | Cited by: 1
STUART M. TURNBULL
Pages: 199-214 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03547.x | Cited by: 0
The Theory of Money. By JURG NIEHANS.
Pages: 215-215 | Published: 3/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03548.x | Cited by: 0