Sample‐Dependent Results Using Accounting and Market Data: Some Evidence
Pages: 779-793 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04548.x | Cited by: 137
ROLF W. BANZ, WILLIAM J. BREEN
The Impact of Preferred‐for‐Common Exchange Offers on Firm Value
Pages: 795-814 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04549.x | Cited by: 22
J. MICHAEL PINEGAR, RONALD C. LEASE
This paper examines the impact of capital structure changes which have no corporate tax consequences. Specifically, exchange offers involving preferred and common stock are analyzed. We find that systematic changes in firm value occur when companies announce preferred‐for‐common exchange offers. Consequently, we interpret our results to be consistent with a signalling hypothesis. We also find weaker evidence suggesting the existence of agency cost effects or wealth redistributions across security classes. Our findings imply that capital structure changes need not alter the tax status of the issuing firm to affect firm value.
Pages: 815-829 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04550.x | Cited by: 494
LAWRENCE HARRIS, EITAN GUREL
Attempts to identify price pressures caused by large transactions may be inconclusive if the transactions convey new information to the market. This problem is addressed in an examination of prices and volume surrounding changes in the composition of the S&P 500. Since these changes cause some investors to adjust their holdings of the affected securities and since it is unlikely that the changes convey information about the future prospects of these securities, they provide an excellent opportunity to study price pressures. The results are consistent with the price‐pressure hypothesis: immediately after an addition is announced, prices increase by more than 3 percent. This increase is nearly fully reversed after 2 weeks.
Asset Price Volatility, Bubbles, and Process Switching
Pages: 831-842 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04551.x | Cited by: 51
ROBERT P. FLOOD, ROBERT J. HODRICK
Evidence of excess volatilities of asset prices compared with those of market fundamentals is often attributed to speculative bubbles. This study demonstrates that bubbles could in theory lead to excess volatility, but it shows that certain variance bounds tests preclude bubbles as an explanation. The evidence ought to be attributed to model misspecification or inappropriate statistical tests. One important misspecification occurs if a researcher incorrectly specifies the time series properties of market fundamentals. A bubble‐free example economy characterized by a potential switch in government policies produces asset prices that would appear, to an unwary researcher, to contain bubbles.
The Pricing of Futures and Options Contracts on the Value Line Index
Pages: 843-855 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04552.x | Cited by: 14
T. HANAN EYTAN, GIORA HARPAZ
This paper considers the problems peculiar to the Value Line Index, because of its use of geometric averaging, as regards the pricing of options and futures on that index. The Value Line Composite Index (VLCI) is an equally weighted geometric average index of nearly 1700 stocks. The VLCI futures market has existed since 1982 while the VLCI options market was established in 1985. This paper provides valuation formulas and analyzes the economic properties of these contracts. Because of the geometric averaging in the VLCI, its contingent claims have special properties. For example, the futures price may fall short of the spot price and the value of a VLCI call option may decline when the volatility of the index is increased. VLCI futures are shown to provide a direct means for duplicating an equally weighted portfolio of the underlying stocks.
Futures Options and the Volatility of Futures Prices
Pages: 857-870 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04553.x | Cited by: 23
CLIFFORD A. BALL, WALTER N. TOROUS
Assuming nonstochastic interest rates, European futures options are shown to be European options written on a particular asset referred to as a futures bond. Consequently, standard option pricing results may be invoked and standard option pricing techniques may be employed in the case of European futures options. Additional arbitrage restrictions on American futures options are derived. The efficiency of a number of futures option markets is examined. Assuming that at‐the‐money American futures options are priced accurately by Black's European futures option pricing model, the relationship between market participants' ex ante assessment of futures price volatility and the term to maturity of the underlying futures contract is also investigated empirically.
Pricing Risk‐Adjusted Deposit Insurance: An Option‐Based Model
Pages: 871-895 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04554.x | Cited by: 376
EHUD I. RONN, AVINASH K. VERMA
This paper presents a methodology for arriving at empirical estimates of deposit insurance premiums from market data by using isomorphic relationships between equity and a call option, and insurance and a put option. The data utilizes the market value of equity to solve for the asset value and its volatility. Market perceptions of FDIC bailout policies are explicitly modeled so as to eliminate the bias in inverted values of assets and their volatility. Sensitivity analyses are performed to show that rank orderings based on premiums are robust to changes in specification, thus facilitating allocation of aggregate premium across banks.
A Model of International Asset Pricing with a Constraint on the Foreign Equity Ownership
Pages: 897-914 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04555.x | Cited by: 148
CHEOL S. EUN, S. JANAKIRAMANAN
This paper derives a closed‐form valuation model in a two‐country world in which the domestic investors are constrained to own at most a fraction, δ, of the number of shares outstanding of the foreign firms. When the “δ constraint” is binding, two different prices rule in the foreign securities market, reflecting the premium offered by the domestic investors over the price under no constraints and the discount demanded by the foreign investors. The premium is shown to be a multiple of the discount, the multiple being the ratio of the aggregate risk aversion of the domestic and foreign investors. Given the aggregate risk‐aversion parameters, the equilibrium premium and discount are determined by the severity of the δ constraint and the “pure” foreign market risk.
The Relationship between Arbitrage and First Order Stochastic Dominance
Pages: 915-921 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04556.x | Cited by: 50
ROBERT JARROW
This paper joins together two fields of research in financial economics. The first field studies stochastic dominance, while the second field studies arbitrage pricing. The two fields are linked together through the derivation and the proof of a characterization theorem. The characterization theorem gives necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of arbitrage opportunities in terms of the existence of two assets, one of which first order stochastically dominates the other and the price of a particular contingent claim. Examples are provided to demonstrate the theorem's content.
The Duration of an Adjustable‐Rate Mortgage and the Impact of the Index
Pages: 923-933 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04557.x | Cited by: 11
ROBERT A. OTT
With the increasing use of adjustable‐rate mortgages for asset/liability management, there exists the need to properly evaluate their price sensitivity to interest rate changes. This paper provides a foundation by deriving the duration of an adjustable‐rate mortgage. The properties of this duration are unique and have some important differences from those of fixed‐rate securities. One important characteristic of an adjustable‐rate mortgage concerns the index used to adjust the mortgage rate. It was found that the index tended to be more important than the adjustment frequency in determining the duration of an adjustable‐rate mortgage.
Callable Bonds: A Risk‐Reducing Signalling Mechanism
Pages: 935-949 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04558.x | Cited by: 38
EDWARD HENRY ROBBINS, JOHN D. SCHATZBERG
The theory of financial economics has failed to distinguish advantages of callable bonds from those of short‐term debt. This paper shows that either type of borrowing can signal a firm's better prospects but that short‐term debt does so at the cost of weakened risk‐sharing with capital markets. By issuing either equity or long‐term, non‐callable debt, a firm with poor investment opportunities will not pool its prospects with those of a better firm. But equity produces superior risk‐sharing. Perhaps this explains the almost complete absence of long‐term, non‐callable bonds from observed corporate capital structures.
Volume for Winners and Losers: Taxation and Other Motives for Stock Trading
Pages: 951-974 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04559.x | Cited by: 143
JOSEF LAKONISHOK, SEYMOUR SMIDT
Capital gains taxes create incentives to trade. Our major finding is that turnover is higher for winners (stocks, the prices of which have increased) than for losers, which is not consistent with the tax prediction. However, the turnover in December and January is evidence of tax‐motivated trading; there is a relatively high turnover for losers in December and for winners in January. We conclude that taxes influence turnover, but other motives for trading are more important. We were unable to find evidence that changing the length of the holding period required to qualify for long‐term capital gains treatment affected turnover.
A Note on the Local Expectations Hypothesis: A Discrete‐Time Exposition
Pages: 975-979 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04560.x | Cited by: 9
CHRISTIAN GILLES, STEPHEN F. LEROY
A Note on Unanticipated Money Growth and Interest Rate Surprises: Mishkin and Makin Revisited
Pages: 981-985 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04561.x | Cited by: 2
KEVIN B. GRIER
Pages: 989-994 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04563.x | Cited by: 0
Book reviewed in this article:
Pages: 995-995 | Published: 9/1986 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04564.x | Cited by: 0