Pages: i-iv | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1998.tb00540.x | Cited by: 0
Pages: v-vii | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1998.tb00539.x | Cited by: 0
Pages: viii-xxxviii | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1998.tb00541.x | Cited by: 0
Pages: 1839-1885 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00077 | Cited by: 2882
Kent Daniel, David Hirshleifer, Avanidhar Subrahmanyam
We propose a theory of securities market under‐ and overreactions based on two well‐known psychological biases: investor overconfidence about the precision of private information; and biased self‐attribution, which causes asymmetric shifts in investors' confidence as a function of their investment outcomes. We show that overconfidence implies negative long‐lag autocorrelations, excess volatility, and, when managerial actions are correlated with stock mispricing, public‐event‐based return predictability. Biased self‐attribution adds positive short‐lag autocorrelations (“momentum”), short‐run earnings “drift,” but negative correlation between future returns and long‐term past stock market and accounting performance. The theory also offers several untested implications and implications for corporate financial policy.
Pages: 1887-1934 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00078 | Cited by: 950
People are overconfident. Overconfidence affects financial markets. How depends on who in the market is overconfident and on how information is distributed. This paper examines markets in which price‐taking traders, a strategic‐trading insider, and risk‐averse marketmakers are overconfident. Overconfidence increases expected trading volume, increases market depth, and decreases the expected utility of overconfident traders. Its effect on volatility and price quality depend on who is overconfident. Overconfident traders can cause markets to underreact to the information of rational traders. Markets also underreact to abstract, statistical, and highly relevant information, and they overreact to salient, anecdotal, and less relevant information.
Pages: 1935-1974 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00079 | Cited by: 1261
Siew Hong Teoh, Ivo Welch, T.J. Wong
Issuers of initial public offerings (IPOs) can report earnings in excess of cash flows by taking positive accruals. This paper provides evidence that issuers with unusually high accruals in the IPO year experience poor stock return performance in the three years thereafter. IPO issuers in the most “aggressive” quartile of earnings managers have a three‐year aftermarket stock return of approximately 20 percent less than IPO issuers in the most “conservative” quartile. They also issue about 20 percent fewer seasoned equity offerings. These differences are statistically and economically significant in a variety of specifications.
Pages: 1975-1999 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00080 | Cited by: 1154
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French
Value stocks have higher returns than growth stocks in markets around the world. For the period 1975 through 1995, the difference between the average returns on global portfolios of high and low book‐to‐market stocks is 7.68 percent per year, and value stocks outperform growth stocks in twelve of thirteen major markets. An international capital asset pricing model cannot explain the value premium, but a two‐factor model that includes a risk factor for relative distress captures the value premium in international returns.
Pages: 2001-2027 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00081 | Cited by: 238
Ian Domowitz, Jack Glen, Ananth Madhavan
Pages: 2029-2057 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00082 | Cited by: 87
Andy Naranjo, M. Nimalendran, Mike Ryngaert
Using an improved measure of a common stock's annualized dividend yield, we document that risk‐adjusted NYSE stock returns increase in dividend yield during the period from 1963 to 1994. This relation between return and yield is robust to various specifications of multifactor asset pricing models that incorporate the Fama–French factors. The magnitude of the yield effect is too large to be explained by a “tax penalty” on dividend income and is not explained by previously documented anomalies. Interestingly, the effect is primarily driven by smaller market capitalization stocks and zero‐yield stocks.
Pages: 2059-2106 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00083 | Cited by: 761
Bernard Dumas, Jeff Fleming, Robert E. Whaley
Derman and Kani (1994), Dupire (1994), and Rubinstein (1994) hypothesize that asset return volatility is a deterministic function of asset price and time, and develop a deterministic volatility function (DVF) option valuation model that has the potential of fitting the observed cross section of option prices exactly. Using S&P 500 options from June 1988 through December 1993, we examine the predictive and hedging performance of the DVF option valuation model and find it is no better than an ad hoc procedure that merely smooths Black–Scholes (1973) implied volatilities across exercise prices and times to expiration.
Pages: 2107-2137 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00084 | Cited by: 1104
Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, Vojislav Maksimovic
We investigate how differences in legal and financial systems affect firms' use of external financing to fund growth. We show that in countries whose legal systems score high on an efficiency index, a greater proportion of firms use long‐term external financing. An active, though not necessarily large, stock market and a large banking sector are also associated with externally financed firm growth. The increased reliance on external financing occurs in part because established firms in countries with well‐functioning institutions have lower profit rates. Government subsidies to industry do not increase the proportion of firms relying on external financing.
Pages: 2139-2159 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00085 | Cited by: 58
Marcia Millon Cornett, Hamid Mehran, Hassan Tehranian
This paper examines firm performance around announcements of common stock issues. We study the banking industry in which some stock issues are made voluntarily by managers, and other issues are involuntary. We find that banks that voluntarily issue common stock experience a significant drop in the matched adjusted operating performance following the issue, a significant drop in benchmark firms' adjusted stock prices following the issue, and systematically negative market reactions to post‐issue quarterly earnings announcements. Banks that issue common stock involuntarily experience values for these measures that are not significantly different from those of the benchmark firm(s).
Pages: 2161-2183 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00086 | Cited by: 148
Paul Gompers, Josh Lerner
Venture capital distributions, a legal form of insider trading, provides an ideal arena for examining the share price impact of transactions by informed parties. These sales, which occur after substantial run‐ups in share value, generate a substantial price reaction immediately around the event. In the months after distribution, returns apparently continue to be negative. When the short‐ and long‐run reactions are decomposed, they are consistent with the view that venture capitalists use inside information to time stock distributions: Distributions of firms brought public by lower quality underwriters and of less seasoned firms have more negative price reactions.
Pages: 2185-2204 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00087 | Cited by: 54
Yaron Brook, Robert Hendershott, Darrell Lee
This paper uses interstate banking deregulation to explore the benefits of takeover deregulation and how these benefits are distributed across different firms. We find large and significant abnormal returns around the Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 which imply it created $85 billion of value in the banking industry. Consistent with an active market for corporate control allowing beneficial consolidation and providing needed discipline, there is a strong negative relationship between banks' abnormal returns and their prior performance. Consistent with managerial entrenchment limiting takeover discipline, banks with higher insider ownership, lower outside block ownership, and/or less independent boards have lower abnormal returns.
Pages: 2205-2223 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00088 | Cited by: 228
Michael J. Aitken, Alex Frino, Michael S. McCorry, Peter L. Swan
This paper investigates the market reaction to short sales on an intraday basis in a market setting where short sales are transparent immediately following execution. We find a mean reassessment of stock value following short sales of up to −0.20 percent with adverse information impounded within fifteen minutes or twenty trades. Short sales executed near the end of the financial year and those related to arbitrage and hedging activities are associated with a smaller price reaction; trades near information events precipitate larger price reactions. The evidence is generally weaker for short sales executed using limit orders relative to market orders.
Pages: 2225-2241 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00089 | Cited by: 447
Gregory R. Duffee
Because the option to call a corporate bond should rise in value when bond yields fall, the relation between noncallable Treasury yields and spreads of corporate bond yields over Treasury yields should depend on the callability of the corporate bond. I confirm this hypothesis for investment‐grade corporate bonds. Although yield spreads on both callable and noncallable corporate bonds fall when Treasury yields rise, this relation is much stronger for callable bonds. This result has important implications for interpreting the behavior of yields on commonly used corporate bond indexes, which are composed primarily of callable bonds.
Pages: 2243-2257 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00090 | Cited by: 132
Why does stock volatility increase when output declines? The theory of investment under uncertainty implies that political uncertainty may simultaneously increase volatility and reduce output. Though cause and effect are typically hard to separate, the transition from Imperial to Weimar Germany offers a natural experiment because major political events left clear traces on stock prices. Current and past increases in volatility are associated with output declines, consistent with U.S. experience. However, political events are more clearly the source of volatility, and the results support the view that the relationship between volatility and output reflects the joint effects of political factors.
Pages: 2259-2264 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00091 | Cited by: 0
David L. Ikenberry, Brad M. Barber
Zvi Bodie and Robert C. Merton, Finance.
Pages: 2265-2266 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00092 | Cited by: 0
Pages: 2267-2268 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00093 | Cited by: 0
Pages: 2271-2273 | Published: 12/1998 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00094 | Cited by: 0