Pages: i-iii | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01538.x | Cited by: 0
Pages: 2427-2479 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01507.x | Cited by: 177
CHRISTOPHER J. MALLOY, TOBIAS J. MOSKOWITZ, ANNETTE VISSING-JØRGENSEN
We provide new evidence on the success of long‐run risks in asset pricing by focusing on the risks borne by stockholders. Exploiting microlevel household consumption data, we show that long‐run stockholder consumption risk better captures cross‐sectional variation in average asset returns than aggregate or nonstockholder consumption risk, and implies more plausible risk aversion estimates. We find that risk aversion around 10 can match observed risk premia for the wealthiest stockholders across sets of test assets that include the 25 Fama and French portfolios, the market portfolio, bond portfolios, and the entire cross‐section of stocks.
Pages: 2481-2513 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01508.x | Cited by: 496
Pages: 2515-2534 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01509.x | Cited by: 160
JAMES J. CHOI, DAVID LAIBSON, BRIGITTE C. MADRIAN, ANDREW METRICK
We show that individual investors over‐extrapolate from their personal experience when making savings decisions. Investors who experience particularly rewarding outcomes from 401(k) saving—a high average and/or low variance return—increase their 401(k) savings rate more than investors who have less rewarding experiences. This finding is not driven by aggregate time‐series shocks, income effects, rational learning about investing skill, investor fixed effects, or time‐varying investor‐level heterogeneity that is correlated with portfolio allocations to stock, bond, and cash asset classes. We discuss implications for the equity premium puzzle and interventions aimed at improving household financial outcomes.
Pages: 2535-2558 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01510.x | Cited by: 36
ROBERT J. BLOOMFIELD, WILLIAM B. TAYLER, FLORA HAILAN ZHOU
We report the results of three experiments based on the model of Hong and Stein (1999). Consistent with the model, the results show that when informed traders do not observe prices, uninformed traders generate long‐term price reversals by engaging in momentum trade. However, when informed traders also observe prices, uninformed traders generate reversals by engaging in contrarian trading. The results suggest that a dominated information set is sufficient to account for the contrarian behavior observed among individual investors, and that uninformed traders may be responsible for long‐term price reversals but play little role in driving short‐term momentum.
Pages: 2559-2590 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01511.x | Cited by: 102
MALCOLM BAKER, ROBIN GREENWOOD, JEFFREY WURGLER
We propose and test a catering theory of nominal stock prices. The theory predicts that when investors place higher valuations on low‐price firms, managers respond by supplying shares at lower price levels, and vice versa. We confirm these predictions in time‐series and firm‐level data using several measures of time‐varying catering incentives. More generally, the results provide unusually clean evidence that catering influences corporate decisions, because the process of targeting nominal share prices is not well explained by alternative theories.
Pages: 2591-2626 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01512.x | Cited by: 397
GEERT BEKAERT, ROBERT J. HODRICK, XIAOYAN ZHANG
We examine international stock return comovements using country‐industry and country‐style portfolios as the base portfolios. We first establish that parsimonious risk‐based factor models capture the data covariance structure better than the popular Heston–Rouwenhorst (1994) model. We then establish the following stylized facts regarding stock return comovements. First, there is no evidence for an upward trend in return correlations, except for the European stock markets. Second, the increasing importance of industry factors relative to country factors was a short‐lived phenomenon. Third, large growth stocks are more correlated across countries than are small value stocks, and the difference has increased over time.
Pages: 2627-2663 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01513.x | Cited by: 49
DAVID C. CICERO
I identify three option exercise strategies executives engage in, including (i) exercising with cash and immediately selling the shares, (ii) exercising with cash and holding the shares, and (iii) delivering some shares to the company to cover the exercise costs and holding the remaining shares. Stock price patterns suggest executives manipulate option exercises. They use private information to increase the profitability of all three strategies, and likely backdated some exercise dates in the pre‐Sarbanes‐Oxley period to enhance the profitability of the latter two strategies, where the executive's company is the only counterparty. Backdating is associated with reporting of internal control weaknesses.
Pages: 2665-2701 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01514.x | Cited by: 14
C. WEI LI, HUI XUE
The acceleration of the U.S. productivity growth in the late 1990s suggests a significant advance in technological innovation, making the perceived probability of entering a “new economy” ever increasing. Based on macroeconomic data, we identify a Bayesian investor's belief evolution when facing a possible structural break in the economy. We show that such belief evolution plays a significant role in explaining both the stock market boom and crash during 1998 to 2001. We conclude that a rational investor's uncertainty about the future of the U.S. economy provides an alternative explanation for the late 1990s stock market “bubble.”
Pages: 2703-2737 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01515.x | Cited by: 31
JUAN-PEDRO GÓMEZ, RICHARD PRIESTLEY, FERNANDO ZAPATERO
This paper tests the cross‐sectional implications of “keeping‐up‐with‐the‐Joneses” (KUJ) preferences in an international setting. When agents have KUJ preferences, in the presence of undiversifiable nonfinancial wealth, both world and domestic risk (the idiosyncratic component of domestic wealth) are priced, and the equilibrium price of risk of the domestic factor is negative. We use labor income as a proxy for domestic wealth and find empirical support for these predictions. In terms of explaining the cross‐section of stock returns and the size of the pricing errors, the model performs better than alternative international asset pricing models.
Pages: 2739-2782 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01516.x | Cited by: 84
RANDOLPH B. COHEN, CHRISTOPHER POLK, TUOMO VUOLTEENAHO
Most previous research tests market efficiency using average abnormal trading profits on dynamic trading strategies, and typically rejects the joint hypothesis of market efficiency and an asset pricing model. In contrast, we adopt the perspective of a buy‐and‐hold investor and examine stock price levels. For such an investor, the price level is more relevant than the short‐horizon expected return, and betas of cash flow fundamentals are more important than high‐frequency stock return betas. Our cross‐sectional tests suggest that there exist specifications in which differences in relative price levels of individual stocks can be largely explained by their fundamental betas.
Pages: 2783-2805 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01517.x | Cited by: 37
A large number of empirical studies find that trading volume contains information about the distribution of future returns. While these studies indicate that observing volume is helpful to an outside observer of the economy it is not clear how investors within the economy can learn from trading volume. In this paper, I show how trading volume helps investors to evaluate the precision of the aggregate information in the price. I construct a model that offers a closed‐form solution of a rational expectations equilibrium where all investors learn from (1) private signals, (2) the market price, and (3) aggregate trading volume.
Pages: 2807-2849 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01518.x | Cited by: 296
VICTOR STANGO, JONATHAN ZINMAN
Exponential growth bias is the pervasive tendency to linearize exponential functions when assessing them intuitively. We show that exponential growth bias can explain two stylized facts in household finance: the tendency to underestimate an interest rate given other loan terms, and the tendency to underestimate a future value given other investment terms. Bias matters empirically: More‐biased households borrow more, save less, favor shorter maturities, and use and benefit more from financial advice, conditional on a rich set of household characteristics. There is little evidence that our measure of exponential growth bias merely proxies for broader financial sophistication.
Pages: 2851-2852 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01520.x | Cited by: 0
Pages: 2853-2854 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01539.x | Cited by: 0
Pages: 2855-2861 | Published: 11/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01537.x | Cited by: 0
Pages: 2862-2920 | Published: 12/2009 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01537_2.x | Cited by: 0