Pages: bmi-bmiii | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12193 | Cited by: 0
Pages: fmi-fmvii | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12192 | Cited by: 0
Pages: 1415-1453 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12174 | Cited by: 33
ROBERT F. STAMBAUGH
During the past few decades, the fraction of the equity market owned directly by individuals declined significantly. The same period witnessed investment trends that include the growth of indexing as well as shifts by active managers toward lower fees and more index‐like investing. I develop an equilibrium model linking these investment trends to the decline in individual ownership, interpreting the latter as a reduction in noise trading. Active management corrects most noise trader–induced mispricing, and the fraction left uncorrected shrinks as noise traders' stake in the market declines. Less mispricing then dictates a smaller footprint for active management.
Pages: 1455-1484 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12084 | Cited by: 121
MARCIN KACPERCZYK, STIJN VAN NIEUWERBURGH, LAURA VELDKAMP
We propose a new definition of skill as general cognitive ability to pick stocks or time the market. We find evidence for stock picking in booms and market timing in recessions. Moreover, the same fund managers that pick stocks well in expansions also time the market well in recessions. These fund managers significantly outperform other funds and passive benchmarks. Our results suggest a new measure of managerial ability that weighs a fund's market timing more in recessions and stock picking more in booms. The measure displays more persistence than either market timing or stock picking alone and predicts fund performance.
Pages: 1485-1527 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12152 | Cited by: 61
BRIAN H. BOYER, KEITH VORKINK
We investigate the relationship between ex ante total skewness and holding returns on individual equity options. Recent theoretical developments predict a negative relationship between total skewness and average returns, in contrast to the traditional view that only coskewness is priced. We find, consistent with recent theory, that total skewness exhibits a strong negative relationship with average option returns. Differences in average returns for option portfolios sorted on ex ante skewness range from 10% to 50% per week, even after controlling for risk. Our findings suggest that these large premiums compensate intermediaries for bearing unhedgeable risk when accommodating investor demand for lottery‐like options.
Pages: 1529-1563 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12166 | Cited by: 62
FLORIAN S. PETERS, ALEXANDER F. WAGNER
We establish that CEOs of companies experiencing volatile industry conditions are more likely to be dismissed. At the same time, accounting for various other factors, industry risk is unlikely to be associated with CEO compensation other than through dismissal risk. Using this identification strategy, we document that CEO turnover risk is significantly positively associated with compensation. This finding is important because job‐risk‐compensating wage differentials arise naturally in competitive labor markets. By contrast, the evidence rejects an entrenchment model according to which powerful CEOs have lower job risk and at the same time secure higher compensation.
Pages: 1565-1596 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12165 | Cited by: 18
WAYNE FERSON, JERCHERN LIN
The literature has not established that a positive alpha, as traditionally measured, means that an investor would want to buy a fund. When alpha is defined using the client's utility function, a positive alpha generally means the client would want to buy. When markets are incomplete, investors will disagree about the attractiveness of a fund. We provide bounds on the expected disagreement with a traditional alpha and study the cross‐sectional relation of disagreement and investor heterogeneity with the flow response to past fund alphas. The effects are both economically and statistically significant.
Pages: 1597-1641 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12161 | Cited by: 18
GILLES CHEMLA, CHRISTOPHER A. HENNESSY
What determines securitization levels, and should they be regulated? To address these questions we develop a model where originators can exert unobservable effort to increase expected asset quality, subsequently having private information regarding quality when selling ABS to rational investors. Absent regulation, originators may signal positive information via junior retentions or commonly adopt low retentions if funding value and price informativeness are high. Effort incentives are below first‐best absent regulation. Optimal regulation promoting originator effort entails a menu of junior retentions or one junior retention with size decreasing in price informativeness. Zero retentions and opacity are optimal among regulations inducing zero effort.
Pages: 1643-1671 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12162 | Cited by: 190
TIM LOUGHRAN, BILL MCDONALD
Defining and measuring readability in the context of financial disclosures becomes important with the increasing use of textual analysis and the Securities and Exchange Commission's plain English initiative. We propose defining readability as the effective communication of valuation‐relevant information. The Fog Index—the most commonly applied readability measure—is shown to be poorly specified in financial applications. Of Fog's two components, one is misspecified and the other is difficult to measure. We report that 10‐K document file size provides a simple readability proxy that outperforms the Fog Index, does not require document parsing, facilitates replication, and is correlated with alternative readability constructs.
Pages: 1673-1704 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12048 | Cited by: 99
DIANE DEL GUERCIO, JONATHAN REUTER
To rationalize the well‐known underperformance of the average actively managed mutual fund, we exploit the fact that retail funds in different market segments compete for different types of investors. Within the segment of funds marketed directly to retail investors, we show that flows chase risk‐adjusted returns, and that funds respond by investing more in active management. Importantly, within this direct‐sold segment, we find no evidence that actively managed funds underperform index funds. In contrast, we show that actively managed funds sold through brokers face a weaker incentive to generate alpha and significantly underperform index funds.
Pages: 1705-1745 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12151 | Cited by: 34
SANDRA BETTON, B. ESPEN ECKBO, REX THOMPSON, KARIN S. THORBURN
Do preoffer target stock price runups increase bidder takeover costs? We present model‐based tests of this issue assuming runups are caused by signals that inform investors about potential takeover synergies. Rational deal anticipation implies a relation between target runups and markups (offer value minus runup) that is greater than minus one‐for‐one and inherently nonlinear. If merger negotiations force bidders to raise the offer with the runup—a costly feedback loop where bidders pay twice for anticipated target synergies—markups become strictly increasing in runups. Large‐sample tests support rational deal anticipation in runups while rejecting the costly feedback loop.
Pages: 1747-1785 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12127 | Cited by: 78
CRAIG W. HOLDEN, STACEY JACOBSEN
Do fast, competitive markets yield liquidity measurement problems when using the popular Monthly Trade and Quote (MTAQ) database? Yes. MTAQ yields distorted measures of spreads, trade location, and price impact compared with the expensive Daily Trade and Quote (DTAQ) database. These problems are driven by (1) withdrawn quotes, (2) second (versus millisecond) time stamps, and (3) other causes, including canceled quotes. The expensive solution, using DTAQ, is first‐best. For financially constrained researchers, the cheap solution—using MTAQ with our new Interpolated Time technique, adjusting for withdrawn quotes, and deleting economically nonsensical states—is second‐best. These solutions change research inferences.
Pages: 1787-1825 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12128 | Cited by: 16
MICHAEL LEMMON, LAURA XIAOLEI LIU, MIKE QINGHAO MAO, GREG NINI
Contrary to recent accounts of off‐balance‐sheet securitization by financial firms, we show that asset securitization by nonfinancial firms provides a valuable form of financing for shareholders without harming debtholders. Using data from firms’ SEC filings, we find that securitization is attractive to firms in the middle of the credit quality distribution, which are the firms with the most to gain. Upon initiation, firms experience positive abnormal stock returns and zero abnormal bond returns, and largely use the securitization proceeds to repay existing debt. Securitization minimizes financing costs by reducing expected bankruptcy costs and providing access to segmented credit markets.
Pages: 1827-1842 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12175 | Cited by: 0
KENNETH J. SINGLETON
Pages: 1843-1844 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12178 | Cited by: 0
Pages: 1845-1846 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12176 | Cited by: 0
Pages: 1847-1848 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12190 | Cited by: 0
Pages: 1849-1849 | Published: 7/2014 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12191 | Cited by: 0