The Journal of Finance

The Journal of Finance publishes leading research across all the major fields of finance. It is one of the most widely cited journals in academic finance, and in all of economics. Each of the six issues per year reaches over 8,000 academics, finance professionals, libraries, and government and financial institutions around the world. The journal is the official publication of The American Finance Association, the premier academic organization devoted to the study and promotion of knowledge about financial economics.

AFA members can log in to view full-text articles below.

View past issues


Search the Journal of Finance:






Search results: 3.

Market Uncertainty and the Least‐Cost Offering Method of Public Utility Debt: A Note

Published: 09/01/1988   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02620.x

FRANK J. FABOZZI, EILEEN MORAN, CHRISTOPHER K. MA


Holiday Trading in Futures Markets

Published: 03/01/1994   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04432.x

FRANK J. FABOZZI, CHRISTOPHER K. MA, JAMES E. BRILEY

In this paper, we find significantly higher preholiday returns in futures contracts compared to nonholiday returns. The findings are consistent with the inventory adjustment hypothesis, since higher preholiday returns associated with lower trading volume are most pronounced for exchange‐closed holidays. There is evidence of positive postholiday returns associated with higher trading volume for exchange‐open holidays. This is consistent with positive holiday sentiments. The holiday effect is uniquely independent: The magnitude of excess holiday returns is the largest among all seasonal variations.


The Resiliency of the High‐Yield Bond Market: The LTV Default

Published: 09/01/1989   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb02641.x

CHRISTOPHER K. MA, RAMESH P. RAO, RICHARD L. PETERSON

This paper investigates the resiliency of the new‐issue high‐yield bond market by examining the changes in implied default rates of such bonds before and after the largest high‐yield bond default, i.e., the LTV bankruptcy. Specifically, the paper compares implied default probabilities of high‐yield bonds during the post‐LTV period calculated from actual new‐issue yields with instrumental default probabilities calculated on the assumption that the default had not occurred. A comparison of these probabilities reveals that the market's perception of default on the high risk segment of the bond market increased significantly after the LTV bankruptcy. However, the effect was transitory, lasting only six months. Thus, the market was resilient to a major default.