The Journal of Finance

The Journal of Finance publishes leading research across all the major fields of finance. It is one of the most widely cited journals in academic finance, and in all of economics. Each of the six issues per year reaches over 8,000 academics, finance professionals, libraries, and government and financial institutions around the world. The journal is the official publication of The American Finance Association, the premier academic organization devoted to the study and promotion of knowledge about financial economics.

AFA members can log in to view full-text articles below.

View past issues


Search the Journal of Finance:






Search results: 50.

Who Manages Risk? An Empirical Examination of Risk Management Practices in the Gold Mining Industry

Published: 9/1996,  Volume: 51,  Issue: 4  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb04064.x  |  Cited by: 1019

PETER TUFANO

This article examines a new database that details corporate risk management activity in the North American gold mining industry. I find little empirical support for the predictive power of theories that view risk management as a means to maximize shareholder value. However, firms whose managers hold more options manage less gold price risk, and firms whose managers hold more stock manage more gold price risk, suggesting that managerial risk aversion may affect corporate risk management policy. Further, risk management is negatively associated with the tenure of firms' CFOs, perhaps reflecting managerial interests, skills, or preferences.


The Determinants of Stock Price Exposure: Financial Engineering and the Gold Mining Industry

Published: 6/1998,  Volume: 53,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00042  |  Cited by: 199

Peter Tufano

This paper studies the exposure of North American gold mining firms to changes in the price of gold. The average mining stock moves 2 percent for each 1 percent change in gold prices, but exposures vary considerably over time and across firms. As predicted by valuation models, gold firm exposures are significantly negatively related to the firm's hedging and diversification activities and to gold prices and gold return volatility, and are positively related to firm leverage. Simple discounted cash flow models produce useful exposure predictions but they systematically overestimate exposures, possibly due to their failure to reflect managerial flexibility.


Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows

Published: 10/1998,  Volume: 53,  Issue: 5  |  DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00066  |  Cited by: 2563

Erik R. Sirri, Peter Tufano

This paper studies the flows of funds into and out of equity mutual funds. Consumers base their fund purchase decisions on prior performance information, but do so asymmetrically, investing disproportionately more in funds that performed very well the prior period. Search costs seem to be an important determinant of fund flows. High performance appears to be most salient for funds that exert higher marketing effort, as measured by higher fees. Flows are directly related to the size of the fund's complex as well as the current media attention received by the fund, which lower consumers' search costs.


A THEORY OF OPTIMAL LIFE INSURANCE: DEVELOPMENT AND TESTS

Published: 6/1973,  Volume: 28,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01381.x  |  Cited by: 17

Peter Fortune


DEPOSIT‐RUN MODEL OF MEMBER BANK BORROWINGS*

Published: 6/1970,  Volume: 25,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00540.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter Formuzis


THE EFFECT OF FHLB BOND OPERATIONS ON SAVINGS INFLOWS AT SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS: COMMENT

Published: 6/1976,  Volume: 31,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb01939.x  |  Cited by: 5

Peter Fortune


A Note on the Pricing of Commodity‐Linked Bonds

Published: 9/1987,  Volume: 42,  Issue: 4  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb03928.x  |  Cited by: 13

PETER CARR


REPLY

Published: 6/1975,  Volume: 30,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1975.tb01868.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter Fortune


The Boats That Did Not Sail: Asset Price Volatility in a Natural Experiment

Published: 5/11/2016,  Volume: 71,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12312  |  Cited by: 70

PETER KOUDIJS

What explains short‐term fluctuations of stock prices? This paper exploits a natural experiment from the 18 century in which information flows were regularly interrupted for exogenous reasons. English shares were traded on the Amsterdam exchange and news came in on sailboats that were often delayed because of adverse weather conditions. The paper documents that prices responded strongly to boat arrivals, but there was considerable volatility in the absence of news. The evidence suggests that this was largely the result of the revelation of (long‐lived) private information and the (transitory) impact of uninformed liquidity trades on intermediaries' risk premia.


The Effect of SOX Section 404: Costs, Earnings Quality, and Stock Prices

Published: 5/7/2010,  Volume: 65,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01564.x  |  Cited by: 442

PETER ILIEV

This paper exploits a natural quasi‐experiment to isolate the effects that were uniquely due to the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX): U.S. firms with a public float under $75 million could delay Section 404 compliance, and foreign firms under $700 million could delay the auditor's attestation requirement. As designed, Section 404 led to conservative reported earnings, but also imposed real costs. On net, SOX compliance reduced the market value of small firms.


The Valuation of Sequential Exchange Opportunities

Published: 12/1988,  Volume: 43,  Issue: 5  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb03967.x  |  Cited by: 182

PETER CARR

Sequential exchange opportunities are valued using the techniques of modern option‐pricing theory. The vehicle for analysis is the concept of a compound exchange option. This security is shown to exist implicitly in several contractual settings. A valuation formula for this option is derived. The formula is shown to generalize much previous work in option pricing. Several applications of the formula are presented.


ANALYSIS OF THE LEASE‐OR‐BUY DECISION: COMMENT

Published: 9/1973,  Volume: 28,  Issue: 4  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01425.x  |  Cited by: 2

Peter Lusztig


CALL FOR PAPERS FOR THE SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE EUROPEAN FINANCE ASSOCIATION (EFA)

Published: 3/1980,  Volume: 35,  Issue: 1  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1980.tb03487.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter Swoboda


DISCUSSION

Published: 5/1971,  Volume: 26,  Issue: 2  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1971.tb00903.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter L. Bernstein


MEMBER BANK RESERVE SETTLEMENT PERIODS: A FURTHER COMMENT

Published: 9/1964,  Volume: 19,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02872.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter D. Sternlight


“THE PAYMENTS IMPACT OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT CONTROLS: REPLY.”

Published: 12/1976,  Volume: 31,  Issue: 5  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb03230.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter H. Lindert


COMPONENTS OF A MEASUREMENT MODEL: RATE OF RETURN, RISK, AND TIMING

Published: 5/1968,  Volume: 23,  Issue: 2  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00802.x  |  Cited by: 18

Peter O. Dietz


THE PORTFOLIO BEHAVIOUR OF SELECTED CANADIAN FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Published: 3/1973,  Volume: 28,  Issue: 1  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01369.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter G. Kirkham


RESERVE SETTLEMENT PERIODS OF MEMBER BANKS: COMMENT

Published: 3/1964,  Volume: 19,  Issue: 1  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb00747.x  |  Cited by: 1

Peter D. Sternlight


RATES OF RETURN ON FILTER TESTS

Published: 3/1976,  Volume: 31,  Issue: 1  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb03197.x  |  Cited by: 11

Peter D. Praetz


A Transactions Data Test of Stock Index Futures Market Efficiency and Index Arbitrage Profitability

Published: 12/1991,  Volume: 46,  Issue: 5  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04644.x  |  Cited by: 111

Y. PETER CHUNG

This paper investigates the efficiency of the market for stock index futures and the profitability of index arbitrage for The Chicago Board of Trade's Major Market Index contracts. The spot value of the index is computed with transactions prices for the component shares of the index obtained from the Fitch database. The tests account for transaction costs, execution lags, and the uptick rule for short sales of stocks. Results indicate that the size and frequency of boundary violations are substantially smaller than those reported by earlier studies and have declined sharply with time.


COMPANY CONTRIBUTIONS TO DISCRETIONARY PROFIT‐SHARING PLANS: COMMENT

Published: 6/1976,  Volume: 31,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb01945.x  |  Cited by: 1

ULF PETER WELAM


THE EFFECTS ON MONETARY POLICY OF RISING COSTS IN COMMERCIAL BANKS*

Published: 3/1963,  Volume: 18,  Issue: 1  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1963.tb01620.x  |  Cited by: 0

H. Peter Gray


THE PAYMENTS IMPACT OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT CONTROLS

Published: 12/1971,  Volume: 26,  Issue: 5  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1971.tb01750.x  |  Cited by: 6

Peter H. Lindert


BANKS' DEMAND FOR EXCESS RESERVES*

Published: 6/1968,  Volume: 23,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00831.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter A. Frost


Presidential Address: Collateral and Commitment

Published: 7/15/2019,  Volume: 74,  Issue: 4  |  DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12782  |  Cited by: 89

PETER M. DEMARZO

Optimal dynamic capital structure choice is fundamentally a problem of commitment. In a standard trade‐off setting with shareholder‐debtholder agency conflicts, full commitment counterfactually predicts the firm would rely almost exclusively on debt financing. Conversely, absent commitment a Modigliani‐Miller‐like value irrelevance and policy indeterminacy result holds. Thus, the content of dynamic trade‐off theory must depend on the commitment technology. In this context, collateral is valuable as a low‐cost commitment device. Because ex ante optimal commitments are likely to be suboptimal ex post, observed capital structure dynamics will exhibit hysteresis and depart significantly from standard predictions.


HIGHER INTEREST RATES ON TIME DEPOSITS: REPLY

Published: 3/1965,  Volume: 20,  Issue: 1  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1965.tb00187.x  |  Cited by: 0

H. Peter Gray


FOREIGN CENTRAL BANKING, 1946–1957: THE INSTRUMENTS AND EFFECTIVENESS OF MONETARY POLICY*

Published: 12/1960,  Volume: 15,  Issue: 4  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1960.tb02773.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter G. Fousek


UNITED STATES CREDIT POLICY IN THE 1954–57 PERIOD*

Published: 3/1961,  Volume: 16,  Issue: 1  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02800.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter D. Sternlight


INFORMATION EXCHANGE IN SECURITY MARKETS AND THE ASSUMPTION OF “HOMOGENEOUS BELIEFS”*

Published: 9/1974,  Volume: 29,  Issue: 4  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03099.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter S. Albin


DISCUSSION

Published: 7/1985,  Volume: 40,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05005.x  |  Cited by: 3

PETER L. BERNSTEIN


COMPENSATORY CYCLICAL BANK ASSET ADJUSTMENTS: COMMENT

Published: 12/1962,  Volume: 17,  Issue: 4  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1962.tb04338.x  |  Cited by: 0

H. Peter Gray


Testing for a Flat Spectrum on Efficient Market Price Data

Published: 6/1979,  Volume: 34,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1979.tb02131.x  |  Cited by: 21

PETER D. PRAETZ


Is Disinflation Good for the Stock Market?

Published: 8/2002,  Volume: 57,  Issue: 4  |  DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00473  |  Cited by: 24

Peter Blair Henry

The stock market appreciates by an average of 24 percent in real dollar terms when countries attempt to stabilize annual inflation rates that are greater than 40 percent. In contrast, the average market response is 0 when the prestabilization rate of inflation is less than 40 percent. These results suggest that the potential long‐run benefits of stabilization may dominate shortrun costs at high levels of inflation, but at low to moderate levels of inflation, benefits may be offset by costs in a present value sense. Stock market responses also help predict the change in inflation and output in the year following all 81 stabilization efforts.


A STUDY OF BANK MERGERS IN MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, 1945 TO 1960*

Published: 3/1968,  Volume: 23,  Issue: 1  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb03008.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter W. Bacon


Common Stock Offerings and Earnings Expectations: A Test of the Release of Unfavorable Information

Published: 9/1992,  Volume: 47,  Issue: 4  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04668.x  |  Cited by: 88

PETER ALAN BROUS

This paper examines the revisions of analysts' forecasts of future earnings around announcements of common stock offerings. The forecasts of the current year earnings are, on average, decreased when firms announce plans to issue additional common stock. The size of the decrease is significantly related to announcement period abnormal stock returns. In contrast, forecasts of the five‐year growth rate of earnings are, on average, unchanged. We interpret these results as being consistent with the claim that equity offering announcements convey unfavorable information regarding the firm's short‐term but not its long‐term earnings prospects.


CIGARETTES AS CURRENCY

Published: 9/1951,  Volume: 6,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1951.tb04473.x  |  Cited by: 2

Peter R. Senn


EVALUATING THE INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE OF NONINSURED PENSION FUNDS*

Published: 12/1965,  Volume: 20,  Issue: 4  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1965.tb02942.x  |  Cited by: 0

Peter O. Dietz


BANKING SERVICES, MINIMUM CASH BALANCES, AND THE FIRM'S DEMAND FOR MONEY

Published: 12/1970,  Volume: 25,  Issue: 5  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00866.x  |  Cited by: 8

Peter A. Frost


On Option Pricing Bounds

Published: 9/1985,  Volume: 40,  Issue: 4  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb02373.x  |  Cited by: 109

PETER H. RITCHKEN

The purpose of this article is to compare the Perrakis and Ryan bounds of option prices in a single‐period model with option bounds derived using linear programming. It is shown that the upper bounds are identical but that the lower bounds are different. A comparison of these bounds, together with Merton's bounds and the Black‐Scholes prices in a lognormal securities market, is presented.


PREREQUISITES FOR THE GROWTH OF CONSUMER INSTALMENT CREDIT

Published: 5/1958,  Volume: 13,  Issue: 2  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1958.tb04187.x  |  Cited by: 1

Peter G. Fousek


On The Predictability of Corporate Earnings Per Share Behavior

Published: 3/1980,  Volume: 35,  Issue: 1  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1980.tb03467.x  |  Cited by: 20

PETER D. CHANT


ON THE METHODOLOGY OF TESTING FOR INDEPENDENCE IN FUTURE PRICES: COMMENT

Published: 6/1976,  Volume: 31,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb01942.x  |  Cited by: 11

Peter D. Praetz


THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS AND POLICY MIX: SIMULATIONS BASED ON A U.S. MODEL

Published: 5/1974,  Volume: 29,  Issue: 2  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03076.x  |  Cited by: 0

PETER B. KENEN


DETERMINANTS OF THE AGGREGATE PROFIT MARGIN: COMMENT

Published: 3/1976,  Volume: 31,  Issue: 1  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb03209.x  |  Cited by: 0

H. Peter Gray


Stock Market Liberalization, Economic Reform, and Emerging Market Equity Prices

Published: 4/2000,  Volume: 55,  Issue: 2  |  DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00219  |  Cited by: 864

Peter Blair Henry

A stock market liberalization is a decision by a country's government to allow foreigners to purchase shares in that country's stock market. On average, a country's aggregate equity price index experiences abnormal returns of 3.3 percent per month in real dollar terms during an eight‐month window leading up to the implementation of its initial stock market liberalization. This result is consistent with the prediction of standard international asset pricing models that stock market liberalization may reduce the liberalizing country's cost of equity capital by allowing for risk sharing between domestic and foreign agents.


SOME EVIDENCE ON TWO IMPLICATIONS OF HIGHER INTEREST‐RATES ON TIME DEPOSITS

Published: 3/1964,  Volume: 19,  Issue: 1  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb00745.x  |  Cited by: 6

H. Peter Gray


An Exploration of Neo‐Austrian Theory Applied to Financial Markets

Published: 6/2001,  Volume: 56,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00353  |  Cited by: 17

Harald Benink, Peter Bossaerts

We attempt to translate Neo‐Austrian ideas about the workings of financial markets, as originally advanced by F. A. Hayek, into the standard probabilistic language of modern finance. We focus on an apparent paradox, namely the insistence of Neo‐Austrians on order (i.e., stationarity) together with ever‐reemerging inefficiencies. The paper's findings have implications beyond Neo‐Austrian theory: They demonstrate how easy it is to reject market efficiency, but how much more difficult it is to discern the nature of the inefficiency. We illustrate our findings with price data from the U.S. Treasury bill market over the period 1962 to 1999. There is ample evidence that the price of a three‐month Treasury bill is not a random walk, yet the sign of the average price change is erratic, so that inference about the nature of the inefficiency is unreliable.


Venturing beyond the IPO: Financing of Newly Public Firms by Venture Capitalists

Published: 2/24/2020,  Volume: 75,  Issue: 3  |  DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12879  |  Cited by: 75

PETER ILIEV, MICHELLE LOWRY

Contrary to conventional wisdom, we document that approximately 15% of venture capitalist (VC)‐backed firms raise additional capital from VCs in the five years after going public. We propose two explanations for why firms revert to VC financing post‐IPO (initial public offering). First, we hypothesize that VC participation in post‐IPO financing represents an efficient solution to informational problems that would otherwise constrain firms’ abilities to exploit value‐increasing investments. Analyses of firm and VC characteristics, together with the finding that these investments are value‐increasing for both VCs and the underlying companies, support this hypothesis. We find no support for the alternative that agency conflicts motivate these investments.


A NOTE ON INVESTMENT EVALUATIONS IN LIGHT OF UNCERTAIN FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES

Published: 12/1972,  Volume: 27,  Issue: 5  |  DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb03026.x  |  Cited by: 5

Bernhard Schwab, Peter Lusztig