The Journal of Finance publishes leading research across all the major fields of finance. It is one of the most widely cited journals in academic finance, and in all of economics. Each of the six issues per year reaches over 8,000 academics, finance professionals, libraries, and government and financial institutions around the world. The journal is the official publication of The American Finance Association, the premier academic organization devoted to the study and promotion of knowledge about financial economics.
AFA members can log in to view full-text articles below.
View past issues
Search the Journal of Finance:
Search results: 50.
PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS, STOCK VALUATION AND CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISION RULES FOR RISKY PROJECTS
Published: 3/1971, Volume: 26, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1971.tb00592.x | Cited by: 46
Richard C. Stapleton
CAPITAL BUDGETING UNDER UNCERTAINTY: A REFORMATION: COMMENT
Published: 12/1974, Volume: 29, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03141.x | Cited by: 5
Richard C. Stapleton
The Valuation of American Options with Stochastic Interest Rates: A Generalization of the Geske—Johnson Technique
Published: 6/1997, Volume: 52, Issue: 2 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04823.x | Cited by: 17
T. S. HO, RICHARD C. STAPLETON, MARTI G. SUBRAHMANYAM
The Geske–Johnson approach provides an efficient and intuitively appealing technique for the valuation and hedging of American‐style contingent claims. Here, we generalize their approach to a stochastic interest rate economy. The method is implemented using options exercisable on one of a finite number of dates. We illustrate how the value of an American‐style option increases with interest rate volatility. The magnitude of this effect depends on the extent to which the option is in the money, the volatilities of the underlying asset and the interest rates, as well as the correlation between them.
Notes on Multiperiod Valuation and the Pricing of Options: A Comment
Published: 3/1984, Volume: 39, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03882.x | Cited by: 0
R. C. STAPLETON, M. G. SUBRAHMANYAM
The Market Model and Capital Asset Pricing Theory: A Note
Published: 12/1983, Volume: 38, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb03846.x | Cited by: 34
R. C. STAPLETON, M. G. SUBRAHMANYAM
This note shows that a linear market model is sufficient to derive a linear relationship between beta and expected return. Furthermore, the slope of the relationship will be identical with that of the Capital Asset Pricing Model if the return on the market portfolio is normally distributed. However, results from characterization theory suggest that the linear market model assumption is close to that of multivariate normality.
The Valuation of Multivariate Contingent Claims in Discrete Time Models
Published: 3/1984, Volume: 39, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03869.x | Cited by: 59
R. C. STAPLETON, M. G. SUBRAHMANYAM
There are several examples in the literature of contingent claims whose payoffs depend on the outcomes of two or more stochastic variables. Familiar cases of such claims include options on a portfolio of options, options whose exercise price is stochastic, and options to exchange one asset for another. This paper derives risk neutral valuation relationships (RNVRs) in a discrete time setting that facilitate the pricing of such complex contingent claims in two specific cases: joint lognormally distributed underlying variables and constant proportional risk aversion on the part of investors, and joint normally distributed underlying variables and constant absolute risk aversion preferences, respectively. This methodology is then applied to the valuation of several interesting complex contingent claims such as multiperiod bonds, multicurrency option bonds, and investment options.
The Valuation of Options When Asset Returns Are Generated by a Binomial Process
Published: 12/1984, Volume: 39, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb04922.x | Cited by: 23
R. C. STAPLETON, M. G. SUBRAHMANYAM
This paper values options on assets whose returns, over a finite interval of time, are generated by a binomial process. It shows that a simple valuation relationship, between the option and the underlying stock, obtains if investors have preference functions that belong to a particular class, even if opportunities to hedge do not exist. One particular application of the theory is in the case where the stock price over a finite interval could increase by an amount, fall by the same amount, or stay at the same level. The results in this paper may be viewed as the foundation of the preference‐based approaches to obtaining a risk neutral valuation relationship.
MARKET IMPERFECTIONS, CAPITAL MARKET EQUILIBRIUM AND CORPORATION FINANCE
Published: 5/1977, Volume: 32, Issue: 2 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03271.x | Cited by: 14
Michael Brennan, R. C. Stapleton, M. G. Subrahmanyam
A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid‐Ask Spread in an Efficient Market
Published: 9/1984, Volume: 39, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03897.x | Cited by: 1384
RICHARD ROLL
In an efficient market, the fundamental value of a security fluctuates randomly. However, trading costs induce negative serial dependence in successive observed market price changes. In fact, given market efficiency, the effective bid‐ask spread can be measured by where “cov” is the first‐order serial covariance of price changes. This implicit measure of the bid‐ask spread is derived formally and is shown empirically to be closely related to firm size.
Financial Expertise as an Arms Race
Published: 9/12/2012, Volume: 67, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01771.x | Cited by: 108
VINCENT GLODE, RICHARD C. GREEN, RICHARD LOWERY
We show that firms intermediating trade have incentives to overinvest in financial expertise. In our model, expertise improves firms’ ability to estimate value when trading a security. Expertise creates asymmetric information, which, under normal circumstances, works to the advantage of the expert as it deters opportunistic bargaining by counterparties. This advantage is neutralized in equilibrium, however, by offsetting investments by competitors. Moreover, when volatility rises the adverse selection created by expertise triggers breakdowns in liquidity, destroying gains to trade and thus the benefits that firms hope to gain through high levels of expertise.
IMPUTED RENT OF OWNER‐OCCUPIED DWELLINGS UNDER THE INCOME TAX
Published: 12/1960, Volume: 15, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1960.tb02766.x | Cited by: 19
Richard Goode
DISCUSSION
Published: 7/1984, Volume: 39, Issue: 3 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03652.x | Cited by: 0
RICHARD RUBACK
BALANCE‐OF‐PAYMENTS PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES*
Published: 3/1954, Volume: 9, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1954.tb01207.x | Cited by: 0
Richard Perlman
INTEREST RATES ON MONETARY ASSETS AND COMMODITY PRICE INDEX CHANGES
Published: 5/1972, Volume: 27, Issue: 2 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb00958.x | Cited by: 55
Richard Roll
MONETARY EQUILIBRIUM AND INTERNATIONAL RESERVE FLOWS IN AUSTRALIA
Published: 12/1974, Volume: 29, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03133.x | Cited by: 6
Richard Zecher
Bankruptcy Risk and Optimal Capital Structure
Published: 12/1983, Volume: 38, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb03845.x | Cited by: 180
RICHARD CASTANIAS
This study finds shortcomings in empirical tests of the capital structure irrelevance hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis is that firms choose value maximizing mixes of debt and equity on account of bankruptcy costs and the tax deductibility of interest payments. Based upon the cross‐sectional implications of the tax shelter‐bankruptcy cost hypothesis, an alternative test of the irrelevance hypothesis is performed. The test examines the relationship between failure rates and leverage ratios for 36 lines of business. The results are inconsistent with the irrelevance hypothesis.
THE REFUNDING DECISION IN NEAR PERFECT MARKETS
Published: 12/1974, Volume: 29, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03128.x | Cited by: 2
Richard Kolodny
AMBIGUITY WHEN PERFORMANCE IS MEASURED BY THE SECURITIES MARKET LINE
Published: 9/1978, Volume: 33, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb02047.x | Cited by: 291
Richard Roll
Industrial Structure and the Comparative Behavior of International Stock Market Indices
Published: 3/1992, Volume: 47, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb03977.x | Cited by: 501
RICHARD ROLL
Stock Price Indices are compared across countries in an attempt to explain why they exhibit such disparate behavior. Three separate explanatory influences are empirically documented. First, part of the behavior can be attributed to a technical aspect of index construction; some indices are more diversified than others. Second, each country's industrial structure plays a major role in explaining stock price behavior. Third, for the majority of countries, a portion of national equity index behavior can be ascribed to exchange rate behavior. Exchange rates explain a significant portion of common currency denominated national index returns, although the amount explained by exchange rates is less than the amount explained by industrial structure for most countries.
AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESES OF NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL PRICING OF RISKY ASSETS
Published: 5/1977, Volume: 32, Issue: 2 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03287.x | Cited by: 133
Richard Stehle
A Nonparametric Model of Term Structure Dynamics and the Market Price of Interest Rate Risk
Published: 12/1997, Volume: 52, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02748.x | Cited by: 289
RICHARD STANTON
This article presents a technique for nonparametrically estimating continuous‐time diffusion processes that are observed at discrete intervals. We illustrate the methodology by using daily three and six month Treasury Bill data, from January 1965 to July 1995, to estimate the drift and diffusion of the short rate, and the market price of interest rate risk. While the estimated diffusion is similar to that estimated by Chan, Karolyi, Longstaff, and Sanders (1992), there is evidence of substantial nonlinearity in the drift. This is close to zero for low and medium interest rates, but mean reversion increases sharply at higher interest rates.
SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON THE INCIDENCE OF THE CORPORATION INCOME TAX (Discussion)
Published: 6/1951, Volume: 6, Issue: 2 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1951.tb04458.x | Cited by: 0
Richard Goode
CORPORATE BORROWING DECISIONS AND THE EVALUATION OF INTEREST RATE FORECASTS*
Published: 9/1974, Volume: 29, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03113.x | Cited by: 0
Richard Kolodny
THE AMERICAN CAPITAL MARKET, 1846–1914: A STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF PUBLIC POLICY ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT*
Published: 9/1970, Volume: 25, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00579.x | Cited by: 1
Richard Sylla
A Possible Explanation of the Small Firm Effect
Published: 9/1981, Volume: 36, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb04890.x | Cited by: 226
RICHARD ROLL
Recent empirical studies have found that small listed firms yield higher average returns than large firms even when their riskiness is equal. The riskiness of small firms, however, has been improperly measured. Apparently, the error is due to auto‐correlation in portfolio returns caused by infrequent trading. Other anomalous predictors of riskadjusted returns, such as price/earnings ratios and dividend yields, may also derive some of their apparent power from this spurious source.
R2
Published: 7/1988, Volume: 43, Issue: 3 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb04591.x | Cited by: 608
RICHARD ROLL
Even with hindsight, the ability to explain stock price changes is modest. s were calculated for the returns of large stocks as explained by systematic economic influences, by the returns on other stocks in the same industry, and by public firm‐specific news events. The average adjusted is only about .35 with monthly data and .20 with daily data. There is little relation between explanatory power and either the firm's size or its industry. There is little improvement in from eliminating all dates surrounding news reports in the financial press. However, the sample kurtosis is quite different when such news events are eliminated, thereby revealing a mixture of return distributions. Non‐news dates also indicate the presence of a distributional mixture, perhaps due to traders acting on private information.
DEPOSIT COMPOSITION AND COMMERCIAL BANK EARNINGS*
Published: 12/1971, Volume: 26, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1971.tb01762.x | Cited by: 0
Richard Bond
EVIDENCE ON THE “GROWTH‐OPTIMUM” MODEL
Published: 6/1973, Volume: 28, Issue: 3 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01378.x | Cited by: 17
Richard Roll
INVESTMENT DIVERSIFICATION AND BOND MATURITY
Published: 3/1971, Volume: 26, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1971.tb00588.x | Cited by: 34
Richard Roll
RETIREMENT OF NON‐CALLABLE PREFERRED STOCK
Published: 12/1970, Volume: 25, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00875.x | Cited by: 3
Richard A. Stevenson
TRADING IN WARRANTS BY MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
Published: 3/1977, Volume: 32, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03244.x | Cited by: 1
Richard J. Rogalski
DISCUSSION
Published: 5/1969, Volume: 24, Issue: 2 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1969.tb01686.x | Cited by: 1
Richard S. Bower
SOME VALUE‐ADDED TAX IMPACTS ON THE INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS OF PRODUCERS
Published: 9/1968, Volume: 23, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00848.x | Cited by: 0
Richard W. Lindholm
DISCUSSION
Published: 3/1950, Volume: 5, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1950.tb00098.x | Cited by: 0
Richard C. Youngdahl
INTEREST RATES, CONTRACT TERMS, AND THE ALLOCATION OF MORTGAGE FUNDS*
Published: 3/1962, Volume: 17, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1962.tb04249.x | Cited by: 2
Richard F. Muth
Yield Approximations: A Historical Perspective: A Correction
Published: 6/1983, Volume: 38, Issue: 3 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb02521.x | Cited by: 0
RICHARD P. BRIEF
DISCUSSION
Published: 5/1980, Volume: 35, Issue: 2 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1980.tb02167.x | Cited by: 0
Richard S. Bower
AN ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF COST‐OF‐CAPITAL CONCEPTS IN NATURAL‐GAS‐PIPELINE RATE REGULATION*
Published: 9/1968, Volume: 23, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00858.x | Cited by: 0
Richard A. Oppedahl
Macroinformation and the Variability of Stock Market Prices
Published: 5/1979, Volume: 34, Issue: 2 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1979.tb02107.x | Cited by: 42
RICHARD P. CASTANIAS
THE POSTWAR RISE IN THE VELOCITY OF MONEY A SECTORAL ANALYSIS*
Published: 12/1961, Volume: 16, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb04235.x | Cited by: 6
Richard T. Selden
COMMENT ON “PUTS AND CALLS: A FACTUAL SURVEY”
Published: 3/1959, Volume: 14, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1959.tb00486.x | Cited by: 1
Richard J. Kruizenga
BANKING STRUCTURE AND BANK PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDY OF THREE SMALL MARKET AREAS*
Published: 9/1965, Volume: 20, Issue: 3 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1965.tb02925.x | Cited by: 0
Richard S. Wallace
RISK‐PREMIUM CURVES FOR DIFFERENT CLASSES OF LONG‐TERM SECURITIES, 1950–1966: COMMENT
Published: 9/1972, Volume: 27, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb01327.x | Cited by: 1
Richard W. McEnally
INITIAL AND INVESTMENT ALLOWANCES UNDER THE BRITISH INCOME TAX AND COUNTER‐CYCLICAL POLICY*
Published: 9/1962, Volume: 17, Issue: 3 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1962.tb04304.x | Cited by: 0
Richard Miller Bird
A NOTE ON THE COST OF TRADE CREDIT AND THE DISCRIMINATORY EFFECTS OF MONETARY POLICY
Published: 12/1974, Volume: 29, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03140.x | Cited by: 1
Richard H. Keehn
Report of the Editor of The Journal of Finance for the Year 2002
Published: 7/15/2003, Volume: 58, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00585 | Cited by: 0
MARKET TESTS OF CAPITAL ADEQUACY OF LARGE COMMERCIAL BANKS
Published: 6/1976, Volume: 31, Issue: 3 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb01929.x | Cited by: 37
Richard H. Pettway
U.S. MONETARY POLICY AND THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS, 1950–60*
Published: 12/1962, Volume: 17, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1962.tb04348.x | Cited by: 0
Richard A. Ward
Benchmark Portfolio Inefficiency and Deviations from the Security Market Line
Published: 6/1986, Volume: 41, Issue: 2 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb05037.x | Cited by: 23
RICHARD C. GREEN
This paper theoretically evaluates the robustness of the Security Market Line relationship when the market proxy employed is not mean‐variance efficient. The analysis focuses on the behavior of the “benchmark errors,” the deviations of assets and portfolios from the Security Market Line. First, we characterize how the location of an asset in mean‐variance space determines its benchmark error. Then the continuity properties of the benchmark errors are studied. The results indicate that the magnitudes of the errors exhibit continuous but not uniformly continuous behaviors. The relative rankings based on deviations from the Security Market Line, however, exhibit some severe discontinuities. In fact, these can be exactly reversed for two proxies arbitrarily close in mean‐variance space.