The Journal of Finance publishes leading research across all the major fields of finance. It is one of the most widely cited journals in academic finance, and in all of economics. Each of the six issues per year reaches over 8,000 academics, finance professionals, libraries, and government and financial institutions around the world. The journal is the official publication of The American Finance Association, the premier academic organization devoted to the study and promotion of knowledge about financial economics.
AFA members can log in to view full-text articles below.
View past issues
Search the Journal of Finance:
Search results: 8.
MARKET VALUE AND SYSTEMATIC RISK
Published: 09/01/1977 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03315.x
Stuart M. Turnbull
Debt Capacity
Published: 09/01/1979 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1979.tb03445.x
STUART M. TURNBULL
Debt Capacity: Erratum
Published: 03/01/1981 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb03546.x
STUART M. TURNBULL
Pricing Derivatives on Financial Securities Subject to Credit Risk
Published: 03/01/1995 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05167.x
ROBERT A. JARROW, STUART M. TURNBULL
This article provides a new methodology for pricing and hedging derivative securities involving credit risk. Two types of credit risks are considered. The first is where the asset underlying the derivative security may default. The second is where the writer of the derivative security may default. We apply the foreign currency analogy of Jarrow and Turnbull (1991) to decompose the dollar payoff from a risky security into a certain payoff and a “spot exchange rate.” Arbitrage‐free valuation techniques are then employed. This methodology can be applied to corporate debt and over the counter derivatives, such as swaps and caps.
Empirical Tests of Boundary Conditions for Toronto Stock Exchange Options
Published: 06/01/1985 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb04968.x
PAUL J. HALPERN, STUART M. TURNBULL
Using option and stock transaction data for the period 1978–1979, three issues were investigated: first, the conformance of observed prices to various boundary conditions; second, the evolution of the market over time, as the volume of trading and the number of listed options increased; and third, to test the efficiency of the market. It was found that violations did occur. Using a trading rule based on the signal of observed violations, the results suggest that even after transaction costs the market was inefficient over the sample period.