The Journal of Finance

Stock Returns, Dividend Yields, and Taxes

Published: 12/17/2002   |   DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00082

Andy Naranjo, M. Nimalendran, Mike Ryngaert

Using an improved measure of a common stock's annualized dividend yield, we document that risk‐adjusted NYSE stock returns increase in dividend yield during the period from 1963 to 1994. This relation between return and yield is robust to various specifications of multifactor asset pricing models that incorporate the Fama–French factors. The magnitude of the yield effect is too large to be explained by a “tax penalty” on dividend income and is not explained by previously documented anomalies. Interestingly, the effect is primarily driven by smaller market capitalization stocks and zero‐yield stocks.

Exodus from Sovereign Risk: Global Asset and Information Networks in the Pricing of Corporate Credit Risk

Published: 04/19/2016   |   DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12412

JONGSUB LEE, ANDY NARANJO, STACE SIRMANS

Using five‐year credit default swap (CDS) spreads on 2,364 companies in 54 countries from 2004 to 2011, we find that firms exposed to stronger property rights through their foreign asset positions (institutional channel) and firms cross‐listed on exchanges with stricter disclosure requirements (informational channel) reduce their CDS spreads by 40 bps for a one‐standard‐deviation increase in their exposure to the two channels. These channels capture effects beyond those associated with firm‐ and country‐level fundamentals. Overall, we find that firm‐level global asset and information connections are important mechanisms to delink firms from their sovereign and country risks.

Time Variation of Ex‐Dividend Day Stock Returns and Corporate Dividend Capture: A Reexamination

Published: 12/17/2002   |   DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00290

Andy Naranjo, M. Nimalendran, Mike Ryngaert

This paper documents some empirical facts about ex‐day abnormal returns to high dividend yield stocks that are potentially subject to corporate dividend capture. We find that average abnormal ex‐dividend day returns are uniformly negative in each year after the introduction of negotiated commission rates and that time variation in ex‐day returns during the negotiated commission rates era is consistent with corporate tax‐based dividend capture. Ex‐day returns are more negative when the tax advantage to corporate dividend capture is greatest and more positive when increases in transaction costs and risk reduce incentives to engage in corporate tax‐based dividend capture.

Individualism and Momentum around the World

Published: 01/13/2010   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01532.x

ANDY C.W. CHUI, SHERIDAN TITMAN, K.C. JOHN WEI

This paper examines how cultural differences influence the returns of momentum strategies. Cross‐country cultural differences are measured with an individualism index developed by Hofstede (2001), which is related to overconfidence and self‐attribution bias. We find that individualism is positively associated with trading volume and volatility, as well as to the magnitude of momentum profits. Momentum profits are also positively related to analyst forecast dispersion, transaction costs, and the familiarity of the market to foreigners, and negatively related to firm size and volatility. However, the addition of these and other variables does not dampen the relation between individualism and momentum profits.

Risk‐Sharing and the Term Structure of Interest Rates

Published: 05/11/2022   |   DOI: 10.1111/jofi.13139

ANDRÉS SCHNEIDER

I propose a general equilibrium model with heterogeneous investors to explain the key properties of the U.S. real and nominal term structure of interest rates. I find that differences in investors' elasticities of intertemporal substitution are critical in accounting for the dynamics of nominal and real yields. The nominal term structure is driven primarily by real shocks so that it can be upward sloping regardless of the correlation between nominal and real shocks.

DISCUSSION

Published: 07/01/1984   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03685.x

ANDREW H. CHEN

Trade Generation, Reputation, and Sell‐Side Analysts

Published: 03/02/2005   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00743.x

ANDREW R. JACKSON

This paper examines the trade‐generation and reputation‐building incentives facing sell‐side analysts. Using a unique data set I demonstrate that optimistic analysts generate more trade for their brokerage firms, as do high reputation analysts. I also find that accurate analysts generate higher reputations. The analyst therefore faces a conflict between telling the truth to build her reputation versus misleading investors via optimistic forecasts to generate short‐term increases in trading commissions. In equilibrium I show forecast optimism can exist, even when investment‐banking affiliations are removed. The conclusions may have important policy implications given recent changes in the institutional structure of the brokerage industry.

THE FIRM'S OPTIMAL FINANCIAL DECISIONS: AN INTEGRATION OF CORPORATE FINANCIAL THEORY UNDER CERTAINTY*

Published: 12/01/1974   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03148.x

Andrew J. Senchack

Proxy Advisory Firms: The Economics of Selling Information to Voters

Published: 04/17/2019   |   DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12779

ANDREY MALENKO, NADYA MALENKO

We analyze how proxy advisors, which sell voting recommendations to shareholders, affect corporate decision‐making. If the quality of the advisor's information is low, there is overreliance on its recommendations and insufficient private information production. In contrast, if the advisor's information is precise, it may be underused because the advisor rations its recommendations to maximize profits. Overall, the advisor's presence leads to more informative voting only if its information is sufficiently precise. We evaluate several proposals on regulating proxy advisors and show that some suggested policies, such as reducing proxy advisors' market power or decreasing litigation pressure, can have negative effects.

Ownership Structure, Speculation, and Shareholder Intervention

Published: 12/17/2002   |   DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.45483

Charles Kahn, Andrew Winton

An institution holding shares in a firm can use information about the firm both for trading (“speculation”) and for deciding whether to intervene to improve firm performance. Intervention increases the value of the institution's existing shareholdings, but intervention only increases the institution's trading profits if it enhances the precision of the institution's information relative to that of uninformed traders. Thus, the ability to speculate can increase or decrease institutional intervention. We examine key factors that affect the intervention decision, the usefulness of “short‐swing” provisions and restricted shares in encouraging institutional intervention, and implications for ownership structure across different firms.

Index Options: The Early Evidence

Published: 07/01/1985   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb04998.x

JEREMY EVNINE, ANDREW RUDD

Index options became the most important traded contracts during their first year of existence. Two contracts, namely those on the S&P100 and the Major Markets Index, have a trading volume which typically surpasses the trading volume in all individual stock option contracts. In this paper, we examine the pricing of the options on the S&P100 and the Major Markets Index. Using intra‐day prices, we find the options frequently violate the arbitrage boundary, put/call parity, and are substantially mispriced relative to theoretical values. Our results suggest that tests of option pricing models may be more difficult than previously realized due to nonsynchronous prices, even using “real‐time” data from the exchanges.

Moral Hazard and Optimal Subsidiary Structure for Financial Institutions

Published: 11/27/2005   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00708.x

CHARLES KAHN, ANDREW WINTON

Banks and related financial institutions often have two separate subsidiaries that make loans of similar type but differing risk, for example, a bank and a finance company, or a “good bank/bad bank” structure. Such “bipartite” structures may prevent risk shifting, in which banks misuse their flexibility in choosing and monitoring loans to exploit their debt holders. By “insulating” safer loans from riskier loans, a bipartite structure reduces risk‐shifting incentives in the safer subsidiary. Bipartite structures are more likely to dominate unitary structures as the downside from riskier loans is higher or as expected profits from the efficient loan mix are lower.

Do Demand Curves for Stocks Slope Down?

Published: 07/01/1986   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04518.x

ANDREI SHLEIFER

Since September, 1976, stocks newly included into the Standard and Poor's 500 Index have earned a significant positive abnormal return at the announcement of the inclusion. This return does not disappear for at least ten days after the inclusion. The returns are positively related to measures of buying by index funds, consistent with the hypothesis that demand curves for stocks slope down. The returns are not related to S & P's bond ratings, which is inconsistent with a plausible version of the hypothesis that inclusion is a certification of the quality of the stock.

Strategic and Financial Bidders in Takeover Auctions

Published: 08/06/2014   |   DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12194

ALEXANDER  S. GORBENKO, ANDREY MALENKO

Using data on auctions of companies, we estimate valuations (maximum willingness to pay) of strategic and financial bidders from their bids. We find that a typical target is valued higher by strategic bidders. However, 22.4% of targets in our sample are valued higher by financial bidders. These are mature, poorly performing companies. We also find that (i) valuations of different strategic bidders are more dispersed and (ii) valuations of financial bidders are correlated with aggregate economic conditions. Our results suggest that different targets appeal to different types of bidders, rather than that strategic bidders always value targets more because of synergies.

Liquidation Values and Debt Capacity: A Market Equilibrium Approach

Published: 09/01/1992   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04661.x

ANDREI SHLEIFER, ROBERT W. VISHNY

We explore the determinants of liquidation values of assets, particularly focusing on the potential buyers of assets. When a firm in financial distress needs to sell assets, its industry peers are likely to be experiencing problems themselves, leading to asset sales at prices below value in best use. Such illiquidity makes assets cheap in bad times, and so ex ante is a significant private cost of leverage. We use this focus on asset buyers to explain variation in debt capacity across industries and over the business cycle, as well as the rise in U.S. corporate leverage in the 1980s.

Trading Volume: Implications of an Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model

Published: 01/11/2007   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01005.x

ANDREW W. LO, JIANG WANG

We derive an intertemporal asset pricing model and explore its implications for trading volume and asset returns. We show that investors trade in only two portfolios: the market portfolio, and a hedging portfolio that is used to hedge the risk of changing market conditions. We empirically identify the hedging portfolio using weekly volume and returns data for U.S. stocks, and then test two of its properties implied by the theory: Its return should be an additional risk factor in explaining the cross section of asset returns, and should also be the best predictor of future market returns.

Theories of Corporate Debt Policy: A Synthesis

Published: 05/01/1979   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1979.tb02098.x

ANDREW H. CHEN, E. HAN KIM

Why Do Markets Move Together? An Investigation of U.S.‐Japan Stock Return Comovements

Published: 07/01/1996   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb02713.x

G. ANDREW KAROLYI, RENÉ M. STULZ

This article explores the fundamental factors that affect cross‐country stock return correlations. Using transactions data from 1988 to 1992, we construct overnight and intraday returns for a portfolio of Japanese stocks using their NYSE‐traded American Depository Receipts (ADRs) and a matched‐sample portfolio of U. S. stocks. We find that U. S. macroeconomic announcements, shocks to the Yen/Dollar foreign exchange rate and Treasury bill returns, and industry effects have no measurable influence on U.S. and Japanese return correlations. However, large shocks to broad‐based market indices (Nikkei Stock Average and Standard and Poor's 500 Stock Index) positively impact both the magnitude and persistence of the return correlations.

DISCUSSION

Published: 05/01/1973   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01789.x

Andreas G. Papandreou

Corporate Fraud and Business Conditions: Evidence from IPOs

Published: 11/09/2010   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01615.x

TRACY YUE WANG, ANDREW WINTON, XIAOYUN YU

We examine how a firm's incentive to commit fraud when going public varies with investor beliefs about industry business conditions. Fraud propensity increases with the level of investor beliefs about industry prospects but decreases when beliefs are extremely high. We find that two mechanisms are at work: monitoring by investors and short‐term executive compensation, both of which vary with investor beliefs about industry prospects. We also find that monitoring incentives of investors and underwriters differ. Our results are consistent with models of investor beliefs and corporate fraud, and suggest that regulators and auditors should be vigilant for fraud during booms.