The Journal of Finance

The Journal of Finance publishes leading research across all the major fields of finance. It is one of the most widely cited journals in academic finance, and in all of economics. Each of the six issues per year reaches over 8,000 academics, finance professionals, libraries, and government and financial institutions around the world. The journal is the official publication of The American Finance Association, the premier academic organization devoted to the study and promotion of knowledge about financial economics.

AFA members can log in to view full-text articles below.

View past issues


Search the Journal of Finance:






Search results: 7.

A NOTE ON THE MEASUREMENT OF CONGLOMERATE DIVERSIFICATION

Published: 09/01/1970   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00564.x

Randolph Westerfield


A BEHAVIORAL APPROACH TO THE INVESTMENT‐MANAGEMENT DECISION AND TO THE SECURITIES MARKETS*

Published: 03/01/1969   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1969.tb00359.x

Randolph Westerfield


Co‐Skewness and Capital Asset Pricing

Published: 09/01/1980   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1980.tb03508.x

IRWIN FRIEND, RANDOLPH WESTERFIELD


The Week‐End Effect in Common Stock Returns: The International Evidence

Published: 06/01/1985   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb04966.x

JEFFREY JAFFE, RANDOLPH WESTERFIELD

This paper examines the daily stock market returns for four foreign countries. We find a so‐called “week‐end effect” in each country. In addition, the lowest mean returns for the Japanese and Australian stock markets occur on Tuesday.


A PROBLEM IN PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION TECHNIQUES FOR CAPITAL BUDGETING

Published: 06/01/1972   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb00994.x

Robert H. Keeley, Randolph Westerfield


Earnings Yields, Market Values, and Stock Returns

Published: 03/01/1989   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb02408.x

JEFFREY JAFFE, DONALD B. KEIM, RANDOLPH WESTERFIELD

Earlier evidence concerning the relation between stock returns and the effects of size and earnings to price ratio (E/P) is not clear‐cut. This paper re‐examines these two effects with (a) a substantially longer sample period, 1951–1986, (b) data that are reasonably free of survivor biases, (c) both portfolio and seemingly unrelated regression tests, and (d) an emphasis on the important differences between January and other months. Over the entire period, the earnings yield effect is significant in both January and the other eleven months. Conversely, the size effect is significantly negative only in January. We also find evidence of consistently high returns for firms of all sizes with negative earnings.


NEW EVIDENCE ON THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL

Published: 06/01/1978   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb02030.x

Irwin Friend, Randolph Westerfield, Michael Granito