The Journal of Finance publishes leading research across all the major fields of finance. It is one of the most widely cited journals in academic finance, and in all of economics. Each of the six issues per year reaches over 8,000 academics, finance professionals, libraries, and government and financial institutions around the world. The journal is the official publication of The American Finance Association, the premier academic organization devoted to the study and promotion of knowledge about financial economics.
AFA members can log in to view full-text articles below.
View past issues
Search the Journal of Finance:
Search results: 9.
Dividend Surprises Inferred from Option and Stock Prices
Published: 9/1992, Volume: 47, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04675.x | Cited by: 7
SASSON BAE‐YOSEF, ODED H. SARIG
This paper introduces a new method to measure the unexpected component of dividend announcements. While measures used previously were based on various arbitrary models of dividend expectations, our suggested method compares the reaction of stock and option prices to dividend announcements. Our measure is compared to commonly used model‐based measures, to a Box‐Jenkins time‐series‐based measure, and to a Value‐Line Investor Survey‐based measure of dividend surprises. The new measure is more highly correlated with the market's reaction to the announcements than are alternative measures of dividend surprises. The new measure is also shown to be insensitive to the extent to which the options used to identify unexpected dividend announcements are in‐ or out‐of‐the‐money.
INTERACTIONS OF CORPORATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS—IMPLICATIONS FOR CAPITAL BUDGETING: COMMENT
Published: 3/1977, Volume: 32, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03258.x | Cited by: 6
Sasson Bar‐Yosef
ON SOME DEFINITIONAL PROBLEMS WITH THE METHOD OF CERTAINTY EQUIVALENTS
Published: 12/1977, Volume: 32, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03366.x | Cited by: 6
Sasson Bar‐Yosef, Roger Mesznik
A REEXAMINATION OF STOCK SPLITS USING MOVING BETAS
Published: 9/1977, Volume: 32, Issue: 4 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03310.x | Cited by: 45
Sasson Bar‐Yosef, Lawrence D. Brown
Autoregressive Modeling of Earnings‐Investment Causality
Published: 3/1987, Volume: 42, Issue: 1 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb02547.x | Cited by: 26
SASSON BAR‐YOSEF, JEFFREY L. CALLEN, JOSHUA LIVNAT
The purpose of this paper is to empirically test the relationships between corporate earnings and investment. In particular, the study investigates whether knowledge of past investments improves the prediction of future earnings beyond predictions that are based on past earnings alone. Similarly, it investigates whether knowledge of past earnings improves the prediction of future investments beyond knowledge of past investments alone. This is the empirical definition of Granger causality. The empirical results show that the bivariate past series of earnings and investments is superior to the univariate series in predicting future investments but not in predicting future earnings.
Creditor Rights, Enforcement, and Bank Loans
Published: 3/13/2009, Volume: 64, Issue: 2 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01450.x | Cited by: 683
KEE‐HONG BAE, VIDHAN K. GOYAL
We examine whether differences in legal protection affect the size, maturity, and interest rate spread on loans to borrowers in 48 countries. Results show that banks respond to poor enforceability of contracts by reducing loan amounts, shortening loan maturities, and increasing loan spreads. These effects are both statistically significant and economically large. While stronger creditor rights reduce spreads, they do not seem to matter for loan size and maturity. Overall, we show that variation in enforceability of contracts matters a great deal more to how loans are structured and how they are priced.
The Best of Both Worlds: Accessing Emerging Economies via Developed Markets
Published: 6/20/2019, Volume: 74, Issue: 5 | DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12817 | Cited by: 38
JOON WOO BAE, REDOUANE ELKAMHI, MIKHAIL SIMUTIN
A growing body of evidence suggests that the benefits of international diversification via developed markets have declined dramatically. While emerging markets still offer diversification opportunities, their public equity indices capture only a fraction of emerging countries' economic activity. We propose a diversification approach that exploits the global connectedness of developed countries to gain exposure to emerging countries' overall economies rather than their shallow equity markets. In doing so, we demonstrate that developed markets still offer substantial diversification benefits beyond those available through equity indices. Our results suggest that relying on equity indices to assess diversification benefits understates diversification gains.
Limit Orders, Depth, and Volatility: Evidence from the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong
Published: 4/2001, Volume: 56, Issue: 2 | DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00345 | Cited by: 228
Hee‐Joon Ahn, Kee‐Hong Bae, Kalok Chan
We investigate the role of limit orders in the liquidity provision in a pure order‐driven market. Results show that market depth rises subsequent to an increase in transitory volatility, and transitory volatility declines subsequent to an increase in market depth. We also examine how transitory volatility affects the mix between limit orders and market orders. When transitory volatility arises from the ask (bid) side, investors will submit more limit sell (buy) orders than market sell (buy) orders. This result is consistent with the existence of limit‐order traders who enter the market and place orders when liquidity is needed.
Tunneling or Value Added? Evidence from Mergers by Korean Business Groups
Published: 12/2002, Volume: 57, Issue: 6 | DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00510 | Cited by: 936
Kee‐Hong Bae, Jun‐Koo Kang, Jin‐Mo Kim
We examine whether firms belonging to Korean business groups (chaebols) benefit from acquisitions they make or whether such acquisitions provide a way for controlling shareholders to increase their wealth by increasing the value of other group firms (tunneling). We find that when a chaebol‐affiliated firm makes an acquisition, its stock price on average falls. While minority shareholders of a chaebol‐affiliated firm making an acquisition lose, the controlling shareholder of that firm on average benefits because the acquisition enhances the value of other firms in the group. This evidence is consistent with the tunneling hypothesis.